Inventions

 

HOME

CONTACT    SITE MAP

AREAS OF OPERATIONS

ABOUT  Us

 INVENTIONS

Inventions    


Celtic Lines
 

Celtic Lines   we know the way


 


 

We welcome communications in the following languages:
English, German, Spanish and French

Great BritainFranceGermanySpain

Celtic Lines

Member of the Baltic Exchange
 

We know how
 

Inventions Inventions with revolutionary engineering design

Sea-Shell 

Please refer to the patent office for all diagrams mentioned in these descriptive texts www.patent.gov.uk

The invention comprises of a two, different, joined, but separable, chemical compound layers creating a sandwich structure. These layers are to be applied onto the inner side of a ship’s hull by spraying. The composite layers are formed from an initial layer of “liquid nylon 12”, or a substance with similar properties. This layer is covered by a secondary latex layer. The coating procedure is to take place once the cargo compartment’s walling is completed. This results in individual sealed units that are accessed via inlet and outlet valves designed for this purpose. The benefits of this process are primarily twofold. It results in a middle layer of hull resistant to shattering, scoring and penetration while leaving an inner layer protecting the environment from mixing with the cargo. The restricted access is recommended to limit, totally, access to the cargo and keeps the inner and outer environments separated.

Technical field: 

The subject of this invention is a dual coating process to be used in the construction of ships hulls. This modification to current ship building practice is brought forward with the intention to radically improve the safety standard of ships and their cargo. The result of this new procedure gives one a vessel that is effectively harder to sink, substantially easier to salvage and totally minimises the environmental effects of something as disastrous as an oil spillage at sea.

The purpose of this invention is to provide ship owners and insurers with a near utopic solution. This invention provides a ship that has a single metal hull with a double skinned inner lining that is both lightweight by comparison to the double metallic hull, is totally waterproof and does not shatter.

The ship’s hull is coated from inside with polyurethane nylon compound liquidised under comparatively low levels of temperature. The coatings are directly sprayed onto the inner hull metal skin. This procedure forms a constant layer of the above material on the hull inner facia. No forms of anti rust procedures are required before the primary polyurethane layer is sprayed on, as the coating must be applied immediately after the completion of the relevant cargo compartment.

The polyurethane nylon compound can be sprayed on the inner surface of the hull without the need for any preparations or treatments of the metal. This compound has such properties that do not allow it to split. It resists scoring in the event the ship’s hull is fractured, hull splits, or an impact causes a section of the hull material to implode into the relevant cargo compartment.

The polyurethane nylon compound is sprayed in repetitive layers until the calculated thickness of the compound is reached. When the primary polyurethane nylon layer is completed and the material sets, a new coating of a second chemical material is applied by the same procedure.

The hull is then sprayed with an oil resistant rubber sealant compound that is applied to the inner hull structure when melted under temperature. The rubber compound coating is sprayed in the same manner using the same tooling and technology procedure as used with the polyurethane nylon compound coating. Repetitive layers of this rubber compound finally create a calculated consistent rubber sealant layer on the inner hull skin.

The completion of this new two material inner sandwich structure provides the following advantages: the outside water pressure cannot enter the cargo compartment, as it is blocked by the two layers and the pressure of the liquid cargo contained within the inner rubber layer that divides the two liquids. Neither, can it mix or exchange place with the internally contained liquid cargo.

Whatever the outer seawater pressure is, any sort of liquid cargo contained within the hold compartment cannot be over-pressurised. Those are the basic physical rules. As a result of this new sealed sandwich compound structure, the seawater looses its ability to enter the cargo compartment and flood it due to the exchange of liquids between the inner and the outer environments.

In an event of hull penetration the two separated liquids actually press against each other over a flexible “rubber membrane”, thus forming an impregnated and totally sealed off cargo environment. The inner hull maintenance costs are in fact no longer worth mentioning. No more costs are required for repetitive painting of the hull from within. The newly created sandwich structure in addition damps noises that are created by the creaking of a large hull due to the twisting and bending forces affecting the structure in rough seas. The excessive cost of building a double skinned tanker, are neither essential now, nor sensible. 

In the first instance when a collision or an accident occurs, that pierces the outer metallic hull layer, the new inner construction of the relevant hold compartment is capable of resisting seawater and forms an effective seal. This allows a ship to continue to the nearest harbour for repairs. If the engines fail to operate, the ship can be easily towed out to sea or to the harbour, as no spillage is endangering such a salvage attempt.

As a result of the newly designed loading valve mechanism and the new structure of the cargo compartments, in the event of a salvage situation, whenever desired, the crude oil cargo can be forced out under pressure from any of the sections of the ship and replaced with compressed air for additional buoyancy. This procedure can be performed anywhere at sea or even underwater. The ship’s salvage action can be completed absolutely safely without any risk to anyone involved.

In the event of a major disaster, the rubber compound lining keeps the cargo contained and seawater uncontaminated until a salvage team arrives. At this stage, the pressing out of the liquid cargo and its replacement by compressed air makes a successful salvage a foregone conclusion.

Even if a ship was to break up completely into sections, the most likely outcome would be that one or maximum two large rubber containers could disengage from the broken ship’s sections and would appear on the sea surface. Each of these would contain the crude oil cargo from a section of the hold that has been broken in two parts. These would still remain sealed due to the special design of the inlet and outlet valves that are in fact fixed to the inner rubber compound lining.

Although, crude oil and super tankers are used as a primary example in the description of this invention, as this is a major concern, the same level of cargo security and safety applies also to grain, powdered cargo of any sort, and any kind of liquids. The additional level of security and safety applies not only to super tanker ships but practically to any vessel transporting any sort of mentioned cargo.

This new ship building procedure should appeal firstly to ship builders due to the ease of use of the materials in the manufacture process. It should be rather important to ship owners who will face substantially lower costs of ship construction and ship maintenance. Yet, the prospects are most interesting in the case of insurers, who will not, any more, have to face so many claims and the value of those that are made will be considerably reduced.

The environmental groups who are evidently concerned with the level of prevention and safety measures should appreciate the effects on environment. At last it is above all the governments that should appreciate this invention, as no more will they have to finance, from their budgets, the “mop-up’s” after super tanker disasters of such an incredible magnitude, which sadly have proved to be more than a “one off event”.

Background:

From the 1970’s when super tankers first came into use, the effects of ships collisions and other disasters at sea have been magnified by visions of horrifying effects on the environment. Solutions to date have included many ways to deal with the spillages, but so far, the best attempts at prevention have been achieved by the use of a double skinned hull. Naturally, this solution results in heavier ships that can carry less and cost more to build. In the event of the worst possible scenario where the ship breaks apart or even sinks, the additional weight of the double skinned vessel brings major complications to any kind of salvage attempts.

The possible collision and its resultant probabilities had to be studied from all angles to provide a long-term solution that would bring financial benefits and thereby increase its potential popularity. The initial problem, on collision, is usually a cut in the ship’s metal structure that leaves a jagged, sharp edged orifice. One needs an internal layer of a strong material able to bend, that resists scoring, that will not permit the actual penetration of the hold.

The second problem is the seawater entering into the hold, which destabilises the ship and causes the cargo to mix with the seawater. As a result of this, exchange of the liquids then takes place. At this stage, one has: - a damaged ship, contaminated sea water with cargo, manoeuvring problems, the risk of a most probable total loss of a ship with cargo, lives at risk, and a major environmental disaster at hand.

If the incursive structure that damages the outer metal layer of the hull is forced to slide along the inner layer, any resulting damage is prevented. If the penetration of the outer metal skin occurs, the polyurethane nylon compound layer disengages itself from this impact location inwards and the inner rubber layer bends inwards with the polyurethane layer due to its elasticity and flexibility.

The liquid cargo remains enclosed in its interior rubber compound container. The risk of any subsequent damage is reduced to an absolute minimum. If the cargo can then be unloaded in its normal condition and the vessel can be safely manoeuvred to harbour, then the financial losses caused by such an event are completely minimised.

Essential technical features:

The invention comprises of the following features:

Polyurethane nylon compound layer

Oil resistant rubber sealant compound

Inlet valve

Outlet valve

The enabling feature of the invention is the rubber layer functioning together with the polyurethane layer placed beneath it.

Component details:

The polyurethane nylon compound layer; the chemical mixture of this polyurethane layer is such that it has a slightly oily feel, allowing this layer to copy the shapes of the interior of the hull skin, but still provide the required separation of the two materials under impact. The material is highly flexible, easy to bend and very hard to break or split. The most important issue is the ability of this material to withstand scoring that occurs when the ship’s hull is for instance penetrated by coral or hard and sharp edged bedrock. This chemical compound is best known for its ability to slip over rough and sharp surfaces without much damage to its structure.

The oil resistant rubber sealant compound; the chemical compound of this material is such that it provides maximum amount of elasticity. The compound is also commonly used in enclosed oil environments, such as in aircraft engines, motor vehicle engines, heavy vehicle engines, and ship’s engines, where it is used as a sealant. It is best known for its oil resistance, water resistance, and capability to hold its properties for considerable time.

The inlet valve; this valve is a completely new concept of a universal two way valve able to transfer and seal liquids, dry cargo, many other kinds of cargo, such as grain, into and out of the cargo compartment under pressure. When the loading pressure drops to a certain level, the valve automatically closes its both ends off. The inlet and outlet valves are in fact two identical valves positioned at the top section of the cargo compartment in opposite corners. The inlet valve is fixed in a very short pipe that ends just below the inner edge of the compartment.

This valve provides an additional function, when unloading the cargo, or in the event of ship salvage. The cargo compartment is pressurised by compressed air through the inlet valve causing the outlet valve to open and allow the cargo to exit the cargo compartment. When all cargo has been removed, the pressure exerted through the inlet valve is terminated and both the inlet and the outlet valves automatically close practically at the same time. This seals off completely the cargo compartment from the outer environment until loading with new cargo. The exact technical specifications, materials, manufacturing process, and construction of this valve are the subject of a new patent to be filed by the inventor in the near future.

The outlet valve; this valve is a completely new concept of a universal two way valve able to transfer and seal liquids, dry cargo, many other kinds of cargo, such as grain, into and out of the cargo compartment under pressure. When the loading pressure drops to a pre set level, the outlet valve automatically closes its both ends off. The outlet valve is of an identical construction as the inlet valve. It is positioned at the top section of the cargo compartment in an opposite corner to the inlet valve. The outlet valve is fixed in a pipe that ends just over the lowest positioned point on the cargo compartment floor.

This valve provides an additional function, when loading the cargo, or in the event of ship salvage. It functions in tandem with the inlet valve enabling the cargo to be loaded or unloaded with the assistance of pressurised air that is led through the inlet valve. When all cargo has been either, loaded or unloaded, the pressure exerted through the inlet valve is terminated, and both the outlet and inlet valves automatically close practically at the same time. This seals off the cargo compartment when it is fully loaded, or unloaded, until the next loading with new cargo. The precise technical specifications, materials used, manufacturing process, and construction of this valve are the subject of a new patent to be filed by the inventor in the near future.

The individual features of the invention interact in the following manner:

The polyurethane nylon compound layer interacts with the ship metallic hull structure. It is sprayed on in coatings and then hardens to form an integral layer that totally seals the cargo compartment walling. The structure of the polymer is such that it detaches from the metal under stress and impact forces. It is this that allows the polymer to remain intact and thereby benefit from its own properties. These include above all a high level of resistance to breakage and scoring.

This layer further interacts with the oil resistant rubber membrane by separating and protecting it from the impact and potential damage that can be caused by jagged metal edges.

It also interacts with the pipes of both the inlet and outlet valves.

The oil resistant rubber sealant compound interacts with the polyurethane nylon compound layer onto which it is sprayed. When it sets, it forms a layer that is adhered to the polyurethane layer, but is capable of separation under the forces of stress or impact. This layer is in direct contact with any form of cargo.

It also interacts with the pipes of both the inlet and outlet valves.

The inlet valve interacts with the inner oil resistant sealant compound layer to which it is adjoined within the inlet pipes.

The outlet valve interacts with the inner oil resistant sealant compound layer to which it is adjoined within the outlet pipes.

Alternatives & substitutions:

The polyurethane nylon compound layer is an essential feature of the invention. It cannot be replaced effectively with any other material that would allow the invention to function better. Thus, it can be substituted only by such materials that possess reasonably equivalent properties. Such substitutions are considered irrelevant as only the best functioning chemical compound will be used.

The oil resistant rubber sealant compound is an essential feature of the invention. It cannot be replaced effectively with any other material that would enhance the invention with better capabilities. Thus, it can be substituted only by such materials that have reasonably equivalent properties. Such substitutions are considered irrelevant as only the best functioning elastic compound will be used.

The inlet valve is not an essential part of the invention. It can be left out of the invention design completely. It can be replaced effectively with other valves that would provide a similar result or function. The choice of materials that can be used for the manufacture of the valves is practically endless. It is felt that substitutions of this sort are in fact irrelevant, as only the best functioning final design and materials will be used.

The ship’s cargo compartments can alternatively be fitted with the new sandwich structure of the hull, without the application of the valves. Even such partial solution of the problem would be a considerable improvement to the current state of affairs. In this situation, access would continue to be from the hold hatches on the top deck. Nevertheless, any of the possible alternatives would not improve the invention.

The outlet valve is not an essential part of the invention. It can be left out of the invention design completely. It can be replaced effectively with other valve systems that would provide a similar result or function. The choice of materials and designs that can be used for the manufacture of the valves is practically endless. It is felt that substitutions of this sort are irrelevant, as only the best functioning final design and material solutions will be used.

The ship’s cargo compartments can alternatively be fitted with the new sandwich structure of the hull, without the application of the valves. Even such partial solution of the problem would be a considerable improvement to the current state of affairs. In this situation, access would continue to be from the hold hatches on the top deck. Nevertheless, any of the possible alternatives would not improve the invention.

Technical requirements & limitations:

The polyurethane nylon compound layer; the chemical compound mixture chosen for the procedure must have the highest level of durability against scoring. It must be able to withstand substantial impact forces without splitting or breaking of the layer. Such tests must be undertaken in test laboratories and also at sea. The finally chosen precise mixture must also posses an amount of oiliness to be able to divide itself on impact from the outer metal skin of the hull as well as from the inner rubber layer. The inventor has chosen a chemical compound named “liquid nylon 12” from “EMS Chemie” of Switzerland. Alternative compounds may be used providing they have the similar properties. No other special technical requirements or limitations need to be specified for this feature of the invention.

The oil resistant rubber sealant compound; the chemical compound mixture chosen for the procedure must have the highest level of elasticity. It must be able to withstand substantial impact forces without tearing of the layer. Such tests must be undertaken in test laboratories and also at sea. The finally chosen precise chemical compound must also posses a substantial amount of oil resistance, so that it will not be affected by the constant contact with the crude oil cargo. No other extra ordinary technical requirements or limitations need to be specified for this feature of the invention.

The inlet valve; this valve is to be manufactured from high quality steel. The precision in the manufacture process is a key issue. The inner spring loaded mechanism must have a pressure calibrated spring that is calibrated for pressures just below the standard amount of pressure required for loading and unloading of the crude oil cargo from its compartment. The two conical heads that are linked together, one with a shaft and the other with a tubular section, must be of precisely the same weight.

Both of the conical steel surfaces that under the loading pressure, create the ideal flow of cargo, are to be chromed and highly polished. The inner silicone compound seals must posses similar properties as the rubber layer applied inside the cargo compartment. No other extra ordinary technical requirements or limitations need to be specified for the above feature of the invention.

The outlet valve; this valve is to be manufactured from high quality steel. The precision in the manufacture process is a key issue. The inner spring loaded mechanism must have a pressure calibrated spring that is calibrated for pressures just below the standard amount of pressure required for loading and unloading of the crude oil cargo from its compartment. The two conical heads that are linked together, one with a shaft and the other with a tubular section, must be of precisely the same weight.

Both of the conical steel surfaces that under the loading pressure, create the ideal flow of cargo, are to be chromed and highly polished. The inner silicone compound seals must posses similar properties as the rubber layer applied inside the cargo compartment. No other extra ordinary technical requirements or limitations need to be specified for the above feature of the invention.

Claims:

  1. A claim is made in respect of a double layer coating procedure to be used on a ship’s hull, where the first layer provides protection against damage to the cargo compartment, the ship, and the rubber interior layer and where the second layer is constructed in such a manner as to protect the cargo, substantially as described herein.
  2. A claim is made in respect of a double layer coating procedure, as claimed in claim 1, that is used on ship’s hull and on the walls and the floor of each cargo compartment to form sealed units.
  3. A claim is made in respect of a coating procedure, as claimed in claim 2, that is used with the existing structure of cargo ships that allow access from hatches situated on the ship’s top decks.
  4. A claim is made in respect of a coating procedure, as claimed in claim 2 that restricts access to the hold compartments to that allowed by an inlet and an outlet valve.
  5. A claim is made in respect of a coating procedure, as described in claim 2, that is used with the existing structure of cargo ships that allow access from hatches situated on the ship’s top deck and also permits access to the hold compartments via an inlet and an outlet valve system.
  6. A claim is made in respect of a double layer coating procedure, as claimed in claim 1, that is used on a ship’s hull and on the walls, floor and ceiling of each cargo compartment to form sealed units.
  7. A claim is made in respect of a coating procedure, as claimed in claim 6, that is used with the existing structure of cargo ships that allow access from hatches situated on the ship’s top decks.
  8. A claim is made in respect of a coating procedure, as claimed in claim 6 that restricts access to the hold compartments to that allowed by an inlet and an outlet valve system.
  9. A claim is made in respect of a coating procedure, as claimed in claim 6, that is used with the existing structure of cargo ships that allow access from hatches situated on the ship’s top decks and allow access via inlet and outlet valves.
  10. A claim is made for a coating procedure, as claimed in claim 6, that restricts access to the hold compartments to that allowed by the inlet and the outlet valves that were designed by the inventor to be used in conjunction with this coating procedure.
  11. A claim is made in respect of a double layer coating procedure to be used on a ship’s hull, substantially as described herein.
  12. A claim is made in respect of a double layer coating procedure to be used on a ship’s hull, substantially as described herein, that is to be used in conjunction with a loading procedure via an inlet valve, supported by an outlet valve, and/or hatch access.
  13. A claim is made in respect of a double layer coating procedure to be used on a ship’s hull, substantially as described herein, that is to be used in conjunction with a restricted access valve cargo loading system designed specifically for this purpose.

Please refer to the patent office for all diagrams mentioned in these descriptive texts www.patent.gov.uk

TOP
 

 

>>HOME    >>SITE MAP    >>CONTACT    >>INVENTIONS   >>FEEDBACK
© CELTIC LINES 2006